Well a good time was had by all!!! Here are the links that I have looked at
Integrating Technology in Education Course
Sunday, November 18, 2012
Saturday, November 10, 2012
Edu 8842 Principles of Distance Final Presentation to Barriers to Adoption ICT Presentation
If the video is not working please click here for the direct link to Youtube
http://youtu.be/RX7mg2I0WtA
Annotations
Voogt,J.,Knezek,G,Resta,P,
Searsib,M. (2011) Building a Global Community of Policy-Makers,Researchers,
and Teachers to Move Education Systems into the Digital Age: The Edu SummIT 2012
Report
The report came out
from the EduSummit 2012 Report, which was held on the 8-11th of 2012
at the Unesco Headquarters in Paris. In
attendance there were 120 researchers,
teachers, policy-makers, teachers , persons from the private sectors,
and the UNESCO winners of the King Hamad Bin Isa AL Khalifa for the outstanding
use of ICT in Education. The purpose of
the Report was to achieve the following:
·
To strive to achieve a Global Community
in regards to ICT integration.
·
Report strategies found in the
International Handbook of Information Technology Handbook as well as the impact
of UNESCO programs and initiatives in ICT.
·
Provide strategies and recommendation
for policy, practices and empirical evidence that will promote digital age
education into the system.
In
2009, researchers of 70 along with policy makers and educators from six continents met in the Netherlands for the first EdUsummit. The purpose for this gather was to establish
the role that ICT plays within the 21st century, and look at the
many implications in regards to adoption, support, as well as examining
strategies on future iCT policies globally.
This summit was such a huge hit that it influenced the convening of the
Summit in 2011.
The summit looked at how ICT is changing
the world globally, which has been changing the areas of “economic, politics
and culture aspects of the society.” The
report also showed that the digital Universe has grown and it stated that by
2020 the digital use will be 44 times larger than in 2009. There is a growing access across the
region. Technology has also impacted
education system in the following way:
·
There is greater demand for teachers.
·
Basic need of technology skills and
digital literacy among both teachers and students. “UNESCO Stats shows that “20 percent of all
adults, over 774 million people are not computer literate.
·
There is a significant division between
developed and non developing countries.
The report looked at
the condition and barriers to adoption of ICT and reported that conditions must
be a vision that is shared by others, have people that are able to empower,
and implement the planning process. The report
also demonstrated barriers to education that exist such as the inability
to understand the benefits of ICT in education, lack of policy framework, and
holding on to the traditional ways of
teaching, changing pedagogical approaches. Teachers need to implement the 21st
century skills in order to prepare students for the workforce. These skills include:
·
collaboration
·
communication
·
digital literacy
·
citizenship
·
problem solving and critical thinking
·
creativity
·
productivity.
The report also
revealed that the education Systems needs to be restructured into functioning
into the Digital age. This means that
the barriers that teachers and students
are exhibiting needs to be broken. Once this is done a noticeable difference will
be sought. Some key points include
professional association, learning of strategies to integrate formal and
informal learning, empowering learners, implementation of existent research.
The report was very informative. It not only looked at the barriers and
adoption of ICT but why and the benefits of using it is equally important. The
report showed that we are entering a digital era, and by looking at this trend
now, will save us many heart aches later. Students need to be trained for the
workforce with skills that are not taught at school. This can be seen as a major problem. This
paper also showed the many strategies that can be used to break the barriers
that exist and ways to promote ICT. This
paper will be used within my presentation because it speaks to various levels
of ICT . It is credible and reliable
because it is sound, partnered by UNESCO and is research based as well. The
report main points were very important to my pedagogy. It promoted social change because it will
allow teachers to assess how they teach, note their personal biases and
overcome this phase by doing what is best for their students.
Khan,S,Hasan, M and Clement,C. (2012).
Barriers to the Introduction of ICT into Education
inDeveloping Countries: The example of Bangladesh. International Journal of Instruction. Vol.5. No.2.
inDeveloping Countries: The example of Bangladesh. International Journal of Instruction. Vol.5. No.2.
This
scholarly article represents the many barriers to ICT within Education. It acknowledges that the growth of ICT has
reshaped the present education system and through the use of ICT within the
classroom a powerful learning environment is created. Through the integration of ICT new methodologies from teachers will
be formed. Though Developed countries
are well on their way in integrating
technology effectively in some regions, Developing countries have struggled in
keeping up as well as coming across barriers that prohibits integration. The authors strive to look at pedagogical ,
psychological and cognitive barriers in order to make a change so that adoption
of ICT will become successful.
The definition of ICT was defined by
United Nations report (1999) and Moursund (2003), which highlighted that it
enhances performances, provides faster ways of communication, provides better learning
strategies once ICT is integrated and supported. It also promotes new types of learning
interactive media. The study also found
that even though a comparison between developed and developing region over the
last decade demonstrated that developing regions are way behind with ICT
integration it also disclosed that there was a steady growth rate in use over
the years.
Barriers to the Implementation of
ICT in education occur in various forms.
The authors categorized it into two categories external and
internal. It was reported that lack of
resources, and infrastructure, lack of fund, obscured Visions and Plans,
political factors, social and cultural factors, corruption, lack of time,
teachers’ attitudes and beliefs about ICT, lack of knowledge and skills are all
factors that prevent technology integration using Bangladesh as the case study example. The findings demonstrated that educators must
be committed in the efforts in tearing down the barriers. All stakeholders must become aware of the importance
of ICT and share a common vision.
Professional development is necessary in order to change thinking
patterns and staff development. All
monies that are allocated to Technology must be apportioned to what it is being
used for. With positive attitudes, the
integration of technology will become much easier.
The
paper provided me will alternative barriers that were not mentioned in the
previous article. I found that it spoke
directly to developing countries for where I presently live it is a developing
country as well. The paper highlighted
key definition of ICT which I will use it to describe what is ICT and the many
tools that come under the heading ICT.
The paper was qualitative in nature and an examination of the barriers
was done. This piece provides another
prospective and demonstrates problems that developing countries face. A comparison between the two developed and
developing can be found. This paper will
be a vital piece for my presentation. It
is not only recent but raises issues that
will assist my presentation.
Bingialas, K. (2009).
Barriers to the Successful Integration of ICT Teaching and Learning
environments: A review of the Literature. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science
and Technology education. P. 235-245.
and Technology education. P. 235-245.
ICT
integration is an extremely complex which may cause difficulties. The difficulty
that occurs is known as a barrier.
Barriers are defined as a condition that hinders a specific task or
objective. The study categorized
barriers into two categories Extrinsic and intrinsic. Extrinsic barriers are defined as “first
order and cited access, time, support, resources and training” (Bingialas,
2009). While intrinsic barriers are seen
as” second order and refers to attitudes, beliefs, practices and resistance” (Bingialas,
2009).
Another level of barrier highlighted
in the study was the barrier of teacher level barriers versus school level
barriers. Teacher level barriers refer
to things such as time, self-efficacy, and resistance to change, teachers
attitude. School level barriers refers
to lack of effective training, issues with technical problems, lack of
resources. Balanskat (2006) further
divided barriers into a level of micro level, Meso levels and Macro. Micro level consisted of the attitude of
teachers and their approach to ICT and Meso which relates to institutional
context. Macro level refers to
educational framework.
The
study demonstrated how there is relationship between barriers and by conquering
one barrier others can be elevated and reduces the problem. Stakeholders (teachers, principals,
administration) must collaborate in order to overcome some barriers. Adequate training, new pedagogical rewiring,
support through technical needs to be in
place in schools. This literature review
provides the reader with insight of
present barriers in ICT as well as future issues. Findings also showed that “teachers have a
strong desire for integration but there are too many barriers that prevent
it. These include lack of confidence, lack
of competence, and lack of access to resource. Buabeng-Andoh,C. (2012) Factors Influencing
Teachers’ Adoption and Integration of
information and Communication technology into teaching: A Review of the
Literature. International Journal of Education and Development using
Information and Communication Technology ,Vol,8,Issue 1 pp. 136-155.
information and Communication technology into teaching: A Review of the
Literature. International Journal of Education and Development using
Information and Communication Technology ,Vol,8,Issue 1 pp. 136-155.
The methodology within
this paper is a Literature Review and the paper has included various research studies
in which they refer to within the report.
The findings reported that adoption according to Rogers(2003) “ is the decision of an individual to make
use of an innovation as their best course of action available.” He also states that “adoption starts with
initial hearing about an innovation to final adoption”(p.137). Roger further goes and states that there are five
technology characteristic or attributes that influences ones decision to adopt
and innovation. Some of these barriers
include personal characteristics, ICT competence, computer efficacy, gender,
teaching experience, the workload of the teacher, institutional characteristic,
and professional development.
The findings within the paper demonstrated that difficulties
that exist with the process of diffusion stems from many hindrances. Rogers’ suggests that it is important to understand
the perceptions of an innovation for their strong influences predetermine the
future outcome of its adoption. Educator’s
perception to innovation also will demonstrate how quickly technology will be
implemented within the classroom. It is
only when teachers operate as operators they then will become innovators of the
technology. Findings also shown that
principals and effective leadership is vital in incorporating technology. If the leadership does not believe in the innovation
it will be trickled down to the staff, preventing them from the necessary
support needed to improve self-efficacy issues.
For teachers who wish to integrate technology they must be convinced
that the present alternative is better than the previous result.
This literature review demonstrates a study that is
necessary for understanding the barriers to adoption. I found that the theorist Rogers provided a
theoretical perspective in the understanding of the barriers to adoption. There are key steps one needs to go through in
order for adoption to take place. It is
because of the rise of technologies that has made the adoption of technology difficult. Research has also demonstrated that lack of
knowledge of ICT provides a negative perception. The most important finding that I found was
that teachers had difficulties with the integration and were resistance to
change due to them only having the opportunity to only read and discuss the
importance of ICT. If they were able to
observe the benefits through observation then maybe a difference will be made
with their pedagogy. I found the paper was sound and was credible. I have read Everett Roger Diffusion to
Innovations and I believe that this paper was able to demonstrate the basis of
the difficulties of barriers. This paper
will be beneficial to my video for it is grounded with research.
Giordano,V.
2007. A Professional Development
Method Model to Promote Internet Integration into P-12 Teachers’ Practice:
Mixed Methods Study. Computers in School
Vol. 24(3/4). Pg. 112 - 124. Haworth
Press. Inc.
Giordano examines a
professional model called Project REFLECT. The examination was done in order to
determine if the model will promote Internet integration into the elementary
and secondary level. The study of the method used was the mixed- method study.
This strategy was used when “the researcher bases the inquiry on the assumption
that collecting diverse problem. The broad study begins with a broad survey in
order to generalize results to a population and then, in a second phase,
focuses on qualitative, open ended interviews to collect detailed view from
participants (Crewsell, 2009). The means of which data was collected within
this study was through a mixed- method approach. This consisted of
questionnaires, survey, data sources and interviews of the participants over 3
years duration. This study focused on the responses from the teachers in
regards to how technology can be integrated effectively into the classroom.
The participants of
this research consisted of varying professionals who have different beliefs and
ideologies in regards to education (Giordano, 2007). The researcher used
forty-four schools to assist in the findings and chose two teachers from each
school to represent the participants in the studies. In order for these
participants to participate in the studies, these teachers must first be
nominated by the principal in order to take the professional development
training. The groups of participants met for five in a half hour, once a week,
for eight weeks. The participants then went back into the schools and provided
training to other educators within the school.
The research question
in this study is the analysis of whether the PD model produced sustained change
in teaching practices. It also looks in-depth on how and why teachers change
their teaching practices as well as how they embrace teaching strategies based
on the change. The study focuses on three factors.
1. Whether a specific PD model produces
sustained change in teacher practice or belief regarding technology integration
(Giordano, 2007, p. 113).
2. Factors which will contribute and assist in
change (Giordano, 2007, p.113).
3. Parts of the model which effects professional
development (Giordano, 2007, p.113).
The findings have
shown that professional development can create a change within thought as well
as performance within the classroom. According to Gordano, (2007) the factors,
which assisted in, the change were from support given with Internet
instruction, authentic learning due to enhanced learning experiences, as well
as professional collaborative work using technological practices within the
classroom.
The applicability of
the findings showed that professional development can change the way a teacher
thinks. The researcher chose participant with various beliefs and ideologies
who may or may not have shared the same views of technology. The research which
was conducted, over a 3 years duration was able to note changes within
teachers’ strategies. They also were able to see how participants were able to
conform the thinking of the participant to embrace technology within the
classroom. These new practices developed allowed the participant to go back to
their school and become a change agent to other educators.
This finding has
showed that professional development is vital in the professional development
of an educator and led to change within the attitudes and practices of the
participants. The statistical analysis that was conducted showed the change
occurred over a period. The statistical analysis provided evidence based
argument through the use of surveys, and questionnaires. Interviews allowed the
researcher to be observant and get inside the heads of the participants. The
study was very objective, reliable, and credible throughout the study. Though
the sample could have been bigger, I found that this research supported my
research proposal in social change. This study allowed for a life-altering
change within the attitude of teachers as well as benefiting and equipping
students with the 21st century skills.
Sunday, November 4, 2012
Static Versus Dynamic technologies "Module 5"
http://www.webspirationpro.com/view/1241207a2df54"http://www.webspirationpro.com/view/1241207a2df54">
Please Click to see Concept Map
Reflection
This course has taught be a lot. I took for granted many things we have done in an online learning environment such as discussions for teachers just wanting us to read. However, through learning the principles of distance learning I understood why I was doing the things I did. Moller’s (2008) article states that Static and Dynamic technologies are important for it allows the teacher to make decisions in which tools are appropriate to use. The tools chosen should be appropriate to use in the effectiveness of creating a lesson.
Static technologies are those that mimic traditional classrooms and are teacher led (Moller,2008). I have always been under the impression that we are to try and move away from that kind of teaching. The quote “We look at the present through a rear view mirror” indicates to me if we teach in this way we are teaching the said way we are trying to change. Now in my defence I never knew that some of the devices that I was using such as Prezi, Elearning, Screen shots where seen as static, or something bad. I thought I was using technology. Making a difference from those who do not use technologies. However, I believe that some of these devices can be used in conjunction with dynamic technologies to have a positive effect on learning.
I find that promoting higher learning thinking, synthesising arguments and having students collaborate is vital. Moller demonstrates that at provides for a “deeper cognitive level”. So many times when I teach I realized that students only remember things today for today. They are not able to retain information because the teacher produced the information and the information was not meaningful.
With self-reflection I realized that I do use static Technologies, but as of today I vow to make a difference and change. Fahy(2008) speaks about teachers self-efficacy and how at time it keeps us in bondage. I realize based on ignorance that a change in instruction was not happening because I was not empowered. This course has now empowered me.
Fahy, P. J. (2008). Teaching in an online learning context. In T. Anderson & F. Elloumi (Eds.),Theory and practice of online learning, 2nd ed. (pp. 441-472). Alberta, Canada: Athabasca University.
Moller,L. (2008) Static and Dynamic Technologies. Laureate education, Inc.
Please Click to see Concept Map
Reflection
This course has taught be a lot. I took for granted many things we have done in an online learning environment such as discussions for teachers just wanting us to read. However, through learning the principles of distance learning I understood why I was doing the things I did. Moller’s (2008) article states that Static and Dynamic technologies are important for it allows the teacher to make decisions in which tools are appropriate to use. The tools chosen should be appropriate to use in the effectiveness of creating a lesson.
Static technologies are those that mimic traditional classrooms and are teacher led (Moller,2008). I have always been under the impression that we are to try and move away from that kind of teaching. The quote “We look at the present through a rear view mirror” indicates to me if we teach in this way we are teaching the said way we are trying to change. Now in my defence I never knew that some of the devices that I was using such as Prezi, Elearning, Screen shots where seen as static, or something bad. I thought I was using technology. Making a difference from those who do not use technologies. However, I believe that some of these devices can be used in conjunction with dynamic technologies to have a positive effect on learning.
I find that promoting higher learning thinking, synthesising arguments and having students collaborate is vital. Moller demonstrates that at provides for a “deeper cognitive level”. So many times when I teach I realized that students only remember things today for today. They are not able to retain information because the teacher produced the information and the information was not meaningful.
With self-reflection I realized that I do use static Technologies, but as of today I vow to make a difference and change. Fahy(2008) speaks about teachers self-efficacy and how at time it keeps us in bondage. I realize based on ignorance that a change in instruction was not happening because I was not empowered. This course has now empowered me.
Fahy, P. J. (2008). Teaching in an online learning context. In T. Anderson & F. Elloumi (Eds.),Theory and practice of online learning, 2nd ed. (pp. 441-472). Alberta, Canada: Athabasca University.
Moller,L. (2008) Static and Dynamic Technologies. Laureate education, Inc.
Wednesday, October 31, 2012
Module 4- Graphic Organizers

Please click to enlarge graph.
Reflections
Mark Prensky, states that the students we have today are no longer the students we had long ago. They are now considered as "Digital Natives". this means that they have been emerged in technology. This group grew up with technology and are able to maneuver briskly through that vast innovations that exist. My topic is on the Barriers to Adoption with ICT. Through this investigate I have learned that it is important to make the best with what you have. At present my students are using BlackBerry, IPad, IPOD, Facebook, Twitter, and Whats Up. I can take these technological devices and software and integrate its use within the classroom. For example, phones with internet can be used to record voicethreads, and to create Podcasting. Tablets can do almost everything. It can allow one the ability to get in touch with the greater world and access resource. The tablet also allows for filming, voice recording, watching videos, and researching information. The use of programs such as facebook,Skype, Blackberry messengers, and Iface is used as a tool to collaborate with each other. Students can discuss back and forth and plan for assignments. Ipod can be used to listen to audio podcast, surf the internet, and access information needed for additional information to complete assignments.
My ultimate favorite is the Ipad. This device can allow one to use all these technological tools to be held using one interface. Through the Apps the able complement collaboration,content and communication.
Saturday, October 27, 2012
8842 Principles of Distance Learning/ StoryBoard Outline for the project.
Story Board Outline for this project.
Introduction of ICT- In this clip I will introduce myself. I will discuss the key terms digital native vs. Digital Immigrants. 1:55 seconds.
Video on Barriers to Adoption- Clip shown by Mrs. James about her issue with ICT technologies. Head of department Mr. George with his views about why teachers don't use adoption. 2:00
Key Points to technology- understanding why lack of integration is occurring. graph of ICT Barriers (powerpoint).1:45
Defining barriers- Slide of various forms of Barriers demonstrating how barriers are interrelated.1:35
Best Practices and Solution: Conclusion, and the presentation of the Keynote speaker
Wednesday, October 10, 2012
The Learning Group Responsibility
Participation is collaborative learning is vital. Students use collaboration as a learning tool in which they can socialize, learn, and construct knowledge. There are various ways in which learning can be assessed for example through peer evaluation, self evaluation, through the constructions of projects and ----. I have been studying in an online program for over four years and I must say that collaborative learning is a vital skill to distant learning.
We all have varying levels of skills and knowledge when it comes to technology. Many a time through discussion forums I am thrown for a loop due to new terms that I am introduced too. However, I don’t allow it to be a deterrent. I simply ask questions from my peers or start searching on the internet to learn more. Through the Rubrics students are able to know at hand what the expectation of the instructor is and then no that the evaluation of their work will be fair and equitable based on the criteria.
A student cannot be forced to collaborate within the learning community. I would send an email to find out if there was a problem and try my best to encourage the individual. If the individual refuses to put forth an input them the instructor should be notified. Through peer evaluation, feedback will be presented in regards to the members in the group participation and the lack of participation will be noted. The instructor should play the role as a guide or a mentor not a dictator. His or her expectation in regards to assessment should be clear so that students will know what the teacher expects.
We all have varying levels of skills and knowledge when it comes to technology. Many a time through discussion forums I am thrown for a loop due to new terms that I am introduced too. However, I don’t allow it to be a deterrent. I simply ask questions from my peers or start searching on the internet to learn more. Through the Rubrics students are able to know at hand what the expectation of the instructor is and then no that the evaluation of their work will be fair and equitable based on the criteria.
A student cannot be forced to collaborate within the learning community. I would send an email to find out if there was a problem and try my best to encourage the individual. If the individual refuses to put forth an input them the instructor should be notified. Through peer evaluation, feedback will be presented in regards to the members in the group participation and the lack of participation will be noted. The instructor should play the role as a guide or a mentor not a dictator. His or her expectation in regards to assessment should be clear so that students will know what the teacher expects.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)